-
alexkumm
- 5 stars Rating: 100
69 votes total - Blue chip
- (249)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of HuskersIllustrated only. Join now! 30-Day Free Trial
Twitter: @mikejschaefer Email: mschaefer@247sports.com
Mike Schaefer
- 5 stars Rating: 97
1997 votes total - Starter
- (8927)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joshwfo
- 5 stars Rating: 93
910 votes total - Special teams
- (3823)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jfsmith3 said...
This is a good thread. Thanks fellow B1Gs for allowing the Buckeye comments.
I originally was going to go with a +13 for OSU, and then I watched the NU - UW game on tape last night. Now I'm thinking Nebraska by about +6. However, being an unabashed homer:
1, OSU 27 NU 24 2, NU - Taylor Martinez; OSU - Jonathan Hankins
Confident - NU will be REAL ticked off when the team they watched on the game film Ohio State provided (Ohio UNIVERSITY) is not the team they see Saturday night (Ohio STATE).
Worried - Actually real worried, that a Black Shirt is going to knock Braxton Miller out of the game.
I've got to ask - What is the consensus opinion of the Adidas Alternate Uniforms the Huskers wore this past weekend?
Zonie87
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1796 votes total - Two-deep
- (5904)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jfsmith3 said...
This is a good thread. Thanks fellow B1Gs for allowing the Buckeye comments.
I originally was going to go with a +13 for OSU, and then I watched the NU - UW game on tape last night. Now I'm thinking Nebraska by about +6. However, being an unabashed homer:
1, OSU 27 NU 24 2, NU - Taylor Martinez; OSU - Jonathan Hankins
Confident - NU will be REAL ticked off when the team they watched on the game film Ohio State provided (Ohio UNIVERSITY) is not the team they see Saturday night (Ohio STATE).
Worried - Actually real worried, that a Black Shirt is going to knock Braxton Miller out of the game.
I've got to ask - What is the consensus opinion of the Adidas Alternate Uniforms the Huskers wore this past weekend?
Bills2 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
1237 votes total - Two-deep
- (5121)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Scooby ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
252 votes total - scooby 7
- Walk-on
- (773)
- 18 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ForeverNuts
- 5 stars Rating: 94
2445 votes total - itz Deez!
- Two-deep
- (6534)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz said...
This was the only game I had marked as a surefire 'L' to start the season. Don't see any reason to say any differently now.
Buckeyes - 31 Huskers - 23
POG: Jake Stoneburner - Ohio State POG: Rex Burkhead - Nebraska
Thing I'm most confident about: Our front 7 with struggle with Ohio State. Miller is the prototypical dual-threat QB that gives us fits, and Stoneburner is an absolute nightmare of a matchup for us at TE. Boren is the best blocking FB in the B1G. Ohio State will get over 400 yards of offense against Nebraska and score at least 27 points.
Thing I'm worried about: Turnovers. We pantsed ourselves with turnovers and mistakes in our drubbings at the hands of Wisconsin and Michigan last year on the road in big games. The Shoe is an intimidating environment that our players have shown a tendency to get too anxious and too amped up to play well in. Escpecially early. Really concerned we can't control our emotions and lay an egg on national TV..., again.
Big Red Phoenix
- 5 stars Rating: 91
333 votes total - Redshirt
- (1432)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
zvilleweslhnter
- 5 stars Rating: 89
579 votes total - Walk-on
- (722)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jfsmith3
- 5 stars Rating: 89
219 votes total - Blue chip
- (174)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ncbuckeye2
- 5 stars Rating: 85
229 votes total - Blue chip
- (105)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Big Red Phoenix
- 5 stars Rating: 91
333 votes total - Redshirt
- (1432)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bobrosshairclub ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
1935 votes total - Two-deep
- (4988)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TheUnknownFan
- 5 stars Rating: 93
998 votes total - None Shall Pass...until I lose both arms and legs
- Redshirt
- (1037)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
beardown2489 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
2535 votes total - Two-deep
- (6225)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1334 votes total - Two-deep
- (4626)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz said...
They don't split Stoneburner out wide. And if they do, it is for WR screens or to block in the run game.
He is basically an H-back that sits in the slot and is critical to their edge running game.
When tOSU runs power, they have Boren and Stoneburner in with Hyde providing their lead blocking on the edge. Heuerman (86) interchanges with Boren and Stoneburner with Heuerman being their 'true' TE.
Ohio State isn't concerned about the DE in getting to the edge and rely upon Stoneburner to seal the inside and Hyde and Boren to lead. They use Stoneburner, Heuerman, and Boren in a lot of edge blocking. They naturally assume they'll get to the edge faster than you can get there.
Ohio State didn't utilize Stoneburner against MSU because he was most always covered by Chris Norman when he was slotted, or inside. Norman will be playing on Sundays and is the best LB that MSU has. When Stoneburner was outside, he was nothing more than a decoy route or he was blocking for WR screens.
One thing that really sticks out is that Ohio State's WRs are very poor blockers. Smith and Brown are electric with the ball in their hand, but are easily overtaken by aggressive defensive players when trying to block. Stoneburner and Heuerman are moved to the slot and outside to give Ohio State a physical presence on their edge running plays and blocking for WR screens.
Ohio State didn't even really try to run the ball between the tackles against Michigan State, but get their speed to the outside and look to get their WR's 1-on-1.
The LB's for Michigan State were very impressive in that game. Ohio State put them to the test and they showed up well. Not sure our LB's will show up as well as MSU's did. And if they can't get Stoneburner 1-on-1 with Whaley, or Fisher, or even our NB's, look for them to attack us 1-on-1 with their WR's.
Zonie87
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1796 votes total - Two-deep
- (5904)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz
- 5 stars Rating: 88
1334 votes total - Two-deep
- (4626)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz said...
Scheming is one thing, having the players to pull it off is another.
Ohio State 'bunched' early with some success against Michigan State, but then tried to spread them out after their halftime adjustments. They had some success with both of their attacks in that game, but ultimately were only able to score 17 points due to the solid play from MSU's LB unit. Norman was awesomeness for MSU. He lets them do so many things defensively due to his presence and abilities it is scary. He is a flat out stud.
Undoubtedly Ohio State has some film of the UCLA game in which they spread us out and killed us with 1-on-1 matchups.
Not too mention, they have a wildcard in Miller. Urban fully expects him to make the first guy miss, or to make the free guy on defense unaccountable for because of the dynamic his QB brings to the table.
Urban and OSU's offense will stress you defensively from sideline to sideline, and they are physical on their edge runs in the blocking schemes.
Our DE's and LB's have to show up big time. Our DB's have to be physical.
This is easily our toughest test this season on both sides of the ball.
Zonie87
- 5 stars Rating: 87
1796 votes total - Two-deep
- (5904)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
602Husker said...
1.) NU 34- OSU 31
2.) NU, Martinez; OSU, Braxton Miller
3.) Jamal Turner will be ignored for another week and Braylon Heard will waste away on the sideline for another week
4.) Tie: Maher will miss a crucial FG, Braxton Miller facing our defense without Lavonte David
602Husker ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
500 votes total - Special teams
- (2272)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
obobbo
- 4 stars Rating: 71
268 votes total - Blue chip
- (189)
- 8 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joshwfo said...
Never to early to start one of these threads...
1. Score 2. Player of the game (NU & OSU) 3. 1 thing your confident about, and 1 thing your worried about.
This post has been edited 5 times, most recently by Duplic8tor on 10/4/2012 at 12:48 AM
Duplic8tor
- 4 stars Rating: 69
2337 votes total - Redshirt
- (1596)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
klein12
- 5 stars Rating: 95
2677 votes total - Voicing the Truth
- Team captain
- (13574)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
klein12 said...
Great stuff there Dublic8tor... honestly I feel like these teams are basically mirror images of each other at this moment. The only difference being you guys pulled it out against Cal and couldn't against UCLA. It should be a fun game, the 8 O'Clock start annoys me... a little late, but oh well.
Thanks for the kind words about Bo... people are getting restless in this state right now, a win this weekend would go a long way (well at least until the next game ) Should be a good game.
We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours
OmegaBuckeye ●
- 5 stars Rating: 90
1757 votes total - Redshirt
- (1804)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Skerz said...
They don't split Stoneburner out wide. And if they do, it is for WR screens or to block in the run game.
He is basically an H-back that sits in the slot and is critical to their edge running game.
When tOSU runs power, they have Boren and Stoneburner in with Hyde providing their lead blocking on the edge. Heuerman (86) interchanges with Boren and Stoneburner with Heuerman being their 'true' TE.
Ohio State isn't concerned about the DE in getting to the edge and rely upon Stoneburner to seal the inside and Hyde and Boren to lead. They use Stoneburner, Heuerman, and Boren in a lot of edge blocking. They naturally assume they'll get to the edge faster than you can get there.
Ohio State didn't utilize Stoneburner against MSU because he was most always covered by Chris Norman when he was slotted, or inside. Norman will be playing on Sundays and is the best LB that MSU has. When Stoneburner was outside, he was nothing more than a decoy route or he was blocking for WR screens.
One thing that really sticks out is that Ohio State's WRs are very poor blockers. Smith and Brown are electric with the ball in their hand, but are easily overtaken by aggressive defensive players when trying to block. Stoneburner and Heuerman are moved to the slot and outside to give Ohio State a physical presence on their edge running plays and blocking for WR screens.
Ohio State didn't even really try to run the ball between the tackles against Michigan State, but get their speed to the outside and look to get their WR's 1-on-1.
The LB's for Michigan State were very impressive in that game. Ohio State put them to the test and they showed up well. Not sure our LB's will show up as well as MSU's did. And if they can't get Stoneburner 1-on-1 with Whaley, or Fisher, or even our NB's, look for them to attack us 1-on-1 with their WR's.
Big Red Phoenix
- 5 stars Rating: 91
333 votes total - Redshirt
- (1432)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5




















) Should be a good game.
t-Nebraska vs t-Ohio State Predictions