Online Now 1413

The Bone Yard

The place for inside information on the Nebraska Cornhuskers

On this Board 452
Record: 1821 (5/20/2013)

Online now 883
Record: 4815 (3/13/2012)

Reply

Early Big Ten Power Rankings

  • My buddy Tom Dienhart put out his list today. If you hate it, tweet or e-mail him - not me.

    biggrin

    Dienhart’s early 2013 football power rankings « Big Ten Network

    http://btn.com/2013/01/17/dienharts-early-2013-big-ten-football-power-rankings/

    btn.com

    Kevin Ryan ●

  • I'M SO MAD AT YOU KEVIN

    Bills2 ●

  • Most of that looks fine. Four through seven is a little wishy washy as anyone can debate so and so should be ahead of so and so. Personally I would have it Northwestern, Penn State, Wisconsin, and Michigan State.

    mfldhuskers ●

  • I'm actually not as high on Michigan. I'd say OSU, Nebraska, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Michigan...then pretty much the same. To me, 2-5 is all pretty close, though. I don't think Michigan starts to get scary for another year or two -- though, at home, I think they're favorites to beat Nebraska.

    MikeCaramba

  • MikeCaramba said...

    I'm actually not as high on Michigan. I'd say OSU, Nebraska, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Michigan...then pretty much the same. To me, 2-5 is all pretty close, though. I don't think Michigan starts to get scary for another year or two -- though, at home, I think they're favorites to beat Nebraska.

    I generally have the same question on Michigan. Aren't they installing a completely new offense. Anyone know what they are likely to do at QB. Seems like a lot of change to expect them to be stellar coming off of a pretty lackluster season.

    westoaksarthur

  • westoaksarthur said...

    I generally have the same question on Michigan. Aren't they installing a completely new offense. Anyone know what they are likely to do at QB. Seems like a lot of change to expect them to be stellar coming off of a pretty lackluster season.

    They are turning the corner to a pro formation type of offense with a down hill running scheme. They missed again this recruiting cycle on the WR front. So they will likely not be a national title contender yet until they get the difference maker at the skill position.

    They have recruited something like 12 OL for the 2012 class and the 2013 class, but they continue to miss on the WR.

    This post was edited by mfldhuskers on 1/17/2013 at 12:20 PM

    mfldhuskers ●

  • MikeCaramba said...

    I'm actually not as high on Michigan. I'd say OSU, Nebraska, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Michigan...then pretty much the same. To me, 2-5 is all pretty close, though. I don't think Michigan starts to get scary for another year or two -- though, at home, I think they're favorites to beat Nebraska.

    Most UM fans I've talked to aren't very high on next years team either... My top five would look similar to yours. I might put UM ahead of Wiscy

    No, the INS isn't chasing him; Taylor Martinez just runs like that. . . .

    oade

  • westoaksarthur said...

    I generally have the same question on Michigan. Aren't they installing a completely new offense. Anyone know what they are likely to do at QB. Seems like a lot of change to expect them to be stellar coming off of a pretty lackluster season.

    I think Gardner is the projected starter.

    MikeCaramba

  • MikeCaramba said...

    I think Gardner is the projected starter.

    I really hope Morris wins the job sooner, rather than later. Pelili's defense, when it works, does a hell of a lot better against drop back passers.

    signature image

    "FUNDAMENTALS ARE A CRUTCH FOR THE TALENTLESS". - KENNY POWERS

    Petersenj21 ●

  • Petersenj21 said...

    I really hope Morris wins the job sooner, rather than later. Pelili's defense, when it works, does a hell of a lot better against drop back passers.

    I have a feeling... and it's a hunch... that Hoke wants Gardner as a WR not a QB...

    klein12 ●

  • klein12 said...

    so we go 2-2 in games against... Wyoming, Southern Miss, UCLA and South Dakota State? Did he even look at the OOC schedule before predicting the records?

    Nevermind.

    This post was edited by MikeCaramba on 1/17/2013 at 2:00 PM

    MikeCaramba

  • MikeCaramba said...

    Where does it say that?

    I saw it wrong...

    klein12 ●

  • I wonder about Gradner at QB, saw a lot of throws that were no where around the receivers, he's got to really elevate his game for Michigan to be number 2 in the conference. Nebraska, Northwestern and Wisconsin should be solid. Michigan State needs to find an offense. I look for Penn State to settle in around .500, they will be dealing with depth issues for the next few years. Iowa..man Kirk has got to get some stuff going this year or he may not see the upper part of the Big Ten for a long time, and Iowa can't afford to get rid of him, his buy out is way too high.

    joe1776p

Nebraska
247Sports
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports