In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 366
Online now 113 Record: 4815 (3/13/2012)
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Here's the correct answer: the kids could get one basket, then Jordan would win 11-1.
soooo incredibly disappointed by Matt Jones response...
I don't know how anybody can hear about stories of Jordan in practices, or the 1992 Olympics for that matter, and think they would have any luck scoring more than a bucket. [getoffmylawn]
Some of the kids really thought they would beat MJ 11-0? Come on.
Lebron is the only person that could have beat mj in his prime. Honestly in a best of seven Lebron would win 4-2.
Bruntz just doesn't understand swagger.
Twitter: @mikejschaefer Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
no. the one that said 11-0 said he would lose to Jordan.
i just dont get it. post players say "ya i'd just take it down low over and over" ... puhlease maybe once or twice or even three times but the second jordan got the ball itd be over.
Maybe they thought he was asking about this Michael Jordan
Goal in life is to make the Huskers Illustrated Hall Of Fame
I would take Michael Jordan 15 years from now against any of those kids.
I think I'm dyslexic. I was looking at those 11-10's
If Jordan actually cared... none of them would score a point.
I don't think those kids understand that Jordan at 6'6" would still school them defensively in the post.
Exactly. They act like he has never guarded someone taller than him in the post before.
In a one on one game, Jordan would beat Lebron. Lebron isn't as gifted a score as MJ -- there is no one for Lebron to pass to. Lebron is great but Jordan is the greatest scorer and competitor ever in the game of basketball.
it would be a heck of a battle though... Lebron would be really physical with Jordan, but Jordan would be the same with Lebron. I think Jordan would win because he shoots better and he played in a time when Basketball itself was more phyiscal.
Jordan is physically stronger than any of those kids -- they couldn't back him down and if they tried, he would simply steal the ball from them. He would then back them down to show them how it is done.
Lebron couldn't score with Jordan, no way. Lebron is better at seeing the floor and distributing the ball, but he's not in MJ's realm of creating shots and scoring. MJ was also a far better defender.
sorry bruntz but Matt Jones could easily take Jordan when he is 65.
I want what your smoking but im also a Kobe person
This post was edited by RealChadSchultz 12 months ago
MJ vs. Kobe would be a better match up than Lebron vs. MJ IMO... and I don't even like Kobe.
agreed. Lebron doesn't usually beat people off the dribble. explosive player but not that great of a jump shooter either.
Greatest commercial ever.
A boy, a Twitter page, and the aspiration that you follow him. It's what this country was founded upon.
That video of the old desk jockey putting some points on Jordan made my day.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports